Post #417: Community meeting re 380 Maple West

This is an update of Post #406, a community meeting to introduce the new owner and developer of 380 Maple Avenue West.

Courtesy of Vienna Citizens for Responsible Development, we now know that the meeting will be Tuesday October 29, 7:30 PM at the Vienna Community Center, Northside room.

Based on the current owner’s statement at a recent Town Council meeting, the building is probably going to be an assisted living facility.

Beyond that there are only rumors, but the rumor that makes the most sense to me is that it will be Sunrise Assisted Living.  That would presumably result in Sunrise withdrawing its $30M lawsuit against the Town of Vienna (Post #342).  It might plausibly account for the recent postponement of the initial hearing (Post #405).  But, to be completely clear, that’s rumor.

My guess is that the building will have to be changed enough, to be used as an assisted-living facility, that this is going to have to go back through all of the Town’s various processes — BZA, BAR, PC, TC.  So, you’ll likely have plenty of other opportunities to hear about what they are going to do.

The picture at the top of this posting illustrates another odd twist to this deal, beyond the lawsuit.  Sunrise’s local rival, Kensington assisted living, had already expressed an interest in building at the site of the former BB&T bank, which is more-or-less directly across the street from 380 Maple West. They had, for example, surveyed residents of the adjacent neighborhood and had asked Town Council to vacate an alleyway right-of-way at the back of that lot.

It’s not clear that they will be able to pursue that, given the possible changes in MAC zoning.  But if they can, and still want to, that would lead to the oddity of these competing assisted living facilities being almost directly across the street from one another.  Alternatively, with Sunrise taking over the 380 Maple West property, this might preclude Kensington from using that site.  (For exactly that reason — it would look odd to have two assisted living facilities facing off across Maple Avenue.)

A final and disturbing oddity of this particular street corner is that a restaurant that has long been a fixture of Vienna appears to be deeply in arrears on its property taxes.  That may put yet another large lot into play for redevelopment in my neighborhood.

All of that pretty much mangles up any idea of Vienna having a center of town, or a central business district.  And, along with the new Wawa, brings yet more traffic and bustle to my neighborhood.

 

Post #406: Forthcoming community meeting on the 380 Maple West assisted living facility

I was reminded that I need to write this topic up, based on the most recent Town Council meeting.  So here goes.  This post announces that there will (may?  might?) be a community meeting, sometime soon, for discussion of the proposed assisted living facility at 380 Maple West (Maple and Wade Hampton).  Neighbors of that facility will (most likely) be invited to attend and talk to the assisted living provider.  If you weren’t aware that this was (maybe?) going to be an assisted living facility instead of condos (as passed by Town Council), read Post #378.

I admit that writing these posts has become a chore.  This one more than most.  Continue reading Post #406: Forthcoming community meeting on the 380 Maple West assisted living facility

Post #375: Did I say condos? Just kidding. I meant assisted living.

Sometimes the goings-on in Vienna are just stranger than you can imagine.  So I don’t quite know what to call this one.  Musical chairs?  Bait and switch, the sequel?

Recall that the Town approved a building with 37 condos plus retail at 380 Maple West (corner of Wade Hampton and Maple).

Well, guess again.  Looks like the 380 Maple West developer may just flip the property, and hand it off to become an assisted living facility.  And as part of that, they’ll partially re-open the MAC zoning that had been approved, to allow the builder to “amend the proffers”.

I can’t make up stuff like that.  You can see the (somewhat cryptic) meeting materials here on the Town’s website, and you can see a more detailed writeup on Vienna Citizens for Responsible Development Facebook site.

This possibility isn’t even part of Town of Vienna code.  The Town had to cite a section of  Commonwealth of Virginia statute to justify it.


Say what?

I can only speculate as to what this is about.

Sunrise?  Plausibly, if the assisted living provider is Sunrise, this is Vienna’s way of getting rid of the lawsuit that Sunrise filed against it (Post #342).  As of yesterday, Sunrise’s lawyers may have been unaware of this development, so it is far from clear that Sunrise is, in fact, involved.

Edit:  In addition, this possibility was raised by the developer, to some of the neighbors, well before Sunrise was turned down.  Given Sunrise’s investment in its own proposal at Maple and Center, it seems unlikely that they would be hedging their bets.  Particularly as this property is almost directly across the street from  …

Kensington?  Alternatively, Kensington Assisted Living might be involved here.  Kensington was well underway in developing a proposal for an assisted living facility at the empty BB&T bank building property.  That is virtually across the street from 380 Maple West.  Because I have never seen two competing assisted living facilities across the street from one another, I believe that converting 380 Maple West to assisted living effectively bars Kensington from developing the BB&T bank property.

So … it’s hard to say.  If the assisted living provider in question is Sunrise, then this quashes the Sunrise lawsuit.  But that also materially harms Sunrise’s most direct local competitor, and the owner of the BB&T property.

On the other hand, if the assisted living provider is Kensington, then the Town should, at least in theory, have to explain why it allowed one competitor but denied another, as part of the Sunrise lawsuit.  (Or, possibly, the Town would use this in its defense.   They could claim that approval of this assisted living proves that they were not biased against having old people in the heart of the MAC zone.  So, possibly, this now becomes part of their lawsuit defense?)

On yet a third hand, dissing Sunrise might be intentional.  As an extra bonus for the Town, they effectively get to thumb their noses at Sunrise, as a punishment for Sunrise daring to sue.  And use the fact that they are allowing their competitors into Vienna in their defense against the Sunrise lawsuit.

Or possibly the Town is merely the passive player here, and this is just a by-product of the developer’s selling the right to build to the highest bidder.  Whatever the real motivator, the story has to be told such that, somehow, out of thin air, the developer wants to flip to the property to this new use.  If the Town of Vienna itself were shown to have acted with favoritism toward one of two competitors, they should rightly be sued by the other one.

As it stands, to do this, the Town is going to have to make up a whole bunch of nonsense about why Sunrise was completely inappropriate in the heart of downtown, but fill-in-the-blank is a great fit for a section of Maple where (e.g.) you have to walk a quarter-mile merely to be able to get to the restaurant across the street.

Trying to be an economist for a moment, consider the macroeconomic context. We are way overdue for a recession. The developer faces considerable uncertainty as to when, exactly, the project will be finished and the condos are on the market.  Condos are more sensitive to economic dips than other property. But health care is traditionally thought to be recession-proof. So this could be a way of transferring the right to build from weak hands (individual builder, condos) to strong hands (national chain, assisted living) in anticipation of a general economic slowdown.  And the current owner of those rights likely will make a profit for his trouble.

So, absent better information, either of two scenarios would fit.  This could be the Town’s way of sidestepping the Sunrise lawsuit.  (In which case, keep an eye out to see what favors the Town will use to repay the developer.)  Yet, Sunrise’s lawyers seemed to be unaware of this development.  Or, maybe it’s just business as usual, and the developer is selling the building rights to the highest bidder.  Kensington was definitely interested in that neighborhood.  In which case, I would think it would make it harder for the Town to defend the Sunrise denial in court.  I guess we’ll just have to wait and see.


Care to speak up again?

First, at the time the 380 development was passed, several citizens got up and testified in favor of it.   What a wonderful thing this was.  How this was exactly what the Town needed here.  How this new retail would revitalize this section of town.  How this building should be approved because Vienna desperately needs single-floor living for the elderly.  And so on.

Wonder if we’re going to hear back from them, now that the actual building will have nothing whatsoever to do with what they so strongly defended?  I bet not.

Second, when some Town council members wanted to rescind the original approval, many parties, including the local newspaper, loudly cried “foul”.  A deal’s a deal.  You can’t go back on that.  The very fabric of government would unravel if you could simply undo a deal at will.

Wonder if we’re going to hear from them again, now that the deal is going to change?  I’d bet not.


How can they do that (physically, I mean)?

And by this I mean, how can they take that physical building, as approved, and make an efficient assisted living out of it?  Honestly, for the life of me, I can’t see how they can do that.  So I have to wonder, how much is that building going to have to change, to do this?  Is the entire MAC process that much of a sham, that, after the fact, they can just completely reconfigure the agreed-upon building.  If so, what on earth are we actually going to get at 444 Maple West?

Just off the top of my head, and keeping in mind that Sunrise appears to be shooting for a roughly 100 bed facility as their minimum efficient scale (see Post #205), I’m going to discuss what Sunrise would probably want to do to the building to make it work as an assisted living facility.  So this is structured as if Sunrise were known to be the assisted living provider in question.

The 380 building has too much ground-floor space devoted to parking and retail, relative to what Sunrise needed. Sunrise needed that space for its own common areas, not for parking or retail. But I thought the parking was part of the specification of the building. Can Sunrise just cut that out, and reconfigure the ground floor, as they see fit? So totally change the amount of, location of, and access to the parking, with no public review? Just drop most of the retail? Really? Then what the heck was all that MAC nonsense about in the first place.

Ambulance access.  Recall all the discussion that went on w/r/t/ dedicated ambulance parking and loading at the Maple and Center facility? All the fuss and bother. Made them put in a dedicated space, got all up in their grille about not blocking Maple, and so on. Is that all just moot now? Whatever-the-heck Sunrise wants to do at this location, hey, that’s fair? That can’t be true.

Ambulance nuisance.  The original Sunrise location was not adjacent to a residential area.  Here, does this mean that ambulances would use Glen/Roland to access that building? If so, that’s a big deal to this neighborhood. (Shortest land route from VVFD to that building appears to be Center/Locust/Courthouse/Glenn/Wade Hampton, but the ambulances may be given instructions to stay on the main routes as long as possible.

Even if not, the noise of the siren alone is a big deal to the neighborhood. They’re going to put that here, with zero public comment? Again, what on earth were those MAC public hearings about, then?

Room size versus hallway width.  Assisted living facilities typically have tiny, hotel-sized rooms, linked by broad corridors, to large commons areas. Here, the rooms are too big, the corridors are (I would bet) far too narrow to pass building code for this sort of facility, and it has no common areas at all (other than the shops on the first floor, which are too small to be useful).

Dementia floor.  This building lacks a secure, internal green space for the dementia floor. It lacks all the dedicated common facilities that a dementia floor must have (e.g., its own dining room). I think the 380 building only has one elevator, but the Sunrise needs two, one of which is dedicated to the dementia floor.

Conditional use permit.  As I understand it, Sunrise got a conditional use permit (pending MAC approval) for the use of the land at Maple and Center.  But, the Town’s notice does not even mention the need to get a different conditional use permit, for use of the land at 380 Maple West.  Did they just not bother to mention that, or is the case that if you get such a permit for anywhere in Vienna, you can transfer it as you see fit?  That makes no sense.  So, doesn’t this have to go before the Board of Zoning Appeals?

I just can’t see how this can work, as described. The building as-is doesn’t work, as I see it.  Which means they pretty much have to design a new building.  Can they just do that?  I.e., once approved, can they just swap in a materially different building, for a completely different use, and say, eh, close enough?  If so, what’s the point of those MAC public hearings?

And I will just point, once again, to 444 Maple West.  If this flies, does anybody really know what we’re actually going to get at that location?  Seems like, if this is acceptable, what you actually get with MAC is the right to build … something.  To be determined.

 

Post #328: How many assisted-living beds does Vienna need?

Answer:  About 40.  Maybe a few more, because we’re wealthy, and assisted living is something that you have to be fairly wealthy to afford.   Maybe a few less, because our resident population is a little younger than the US average.  But, best guess, if we use assisted living at the US average rate, then 40 assisted living beds would serve the needs of the entire Town of Vienna.

I calculated that back in March, when Sunrise assisted living (proposed for Maple and Center) was a hot topic, but never got around to making that public.  Here, I work through the arithmetic, then just line out the variety of options available for elderly who have various levels of need for assistance.

If you want information on assisted living, in general, in Northern Virginia, see Post #205.

Continue reading Post #328: How many assisted-living beds does Vienna need?

Post #325: Revising MAC? Time is short? Or is time your friend?

In Post #323, I noted that the process for revising the MAC statute now combines  a looming deadline with zero activity.  That obviously makes no sense, so I think I’d like to take a few guesses as to what may or may not be happening.  So please note that while the first section (Past) is largely fact-based, the end of this post (Future) is pure speculation.

Continue reading Post #325: Revising MAC? Time is short? Or is time your friend?

I’m going to have to ditch the postcard alerts, updated 1/15/2019

My system of using postcards to keep people informed about MAC zoning no longer works.  There are too many buildings in play, events are occurring too fast, the Town’s moratorium on new MAC proposals hasn’t actually stopped the Town from furthering new MAC proposals, and I typically have (maybe) one-to-three days’ notice that the one of the Town’s various boards (Town Council, Planning Commission, Board of Architectural Review, and so on) will be discussing some relevant item. Continue reading I’m going to have to ditch the postcard alerts, updated 1/15/2019

Summary of Current and Potential MAC Projects, Updated 10/26/2018

This page shows all the currently (10/15/2018) known Maple Avenue Commercial (MAC) zoning projects.  You can read the details on each project below. Continue reading Summary of Current and Potential MAC Projects, Updated 10/26/2018

Maple and Center, updated 8/16/2018

 

Second update 8/16/2018:  Looks like we may have two different assisted living facilities in the works.  Kensington assisted living was canvassing houses north of Maple Avenue yesterday, regarding a proposed assisted living facility where the BBT bank is now (415 Maple West).   The BBT lot has long struck me as a likely victim under MAC zoning:  almost an acre, relatively little business, and another BBT at the other end of town (440 Maple East).   So it appears that this is now in process to become yet another large MAC building. Continue reading Maple and Center, updated 8/16/2018