Post #302 made the case that you can’t expect the entire Maple Avenue corridor to become one big “vibrant, pedestrian-oriented” shopping district. Any such district would have to be smaller than the length of Maple. Post #310 pointed out that the Town has no plan for any area smaller than all of Maple.
In this post, I’m going to start to characterize what does and doesn’t appear to work, in this immediate area, in terms of getting that “vibrant, pedestrian-oriented” shopping experience. I focus on the Mosaic District, then turn to Maple.
And there I got a surprise. Define “retail density” as the number of retail establishments within a quarter-mile walk of some point. I figured that Maple Avenue, with those old-fashioned shopping centers, could not possibly be as “retail dense” as Mosaic. I figured, maybe the reason you don’t see people walking to the shops on Maple is that they are far too spread out.
But that’s wrong. The center of Mosaic (Strawberry Lane Park/Target) has 81 retail establishments within a quarter-mile walk. Mosaic claims 350,00 square feet of retail space. I assumed the sprawling Maple Avenue, with its old-fashioned shopping centers, would have nowhere near that density. Dead wrong. The corner of Maple and Glyndon has 107 retail establishments within that same quarter-mile walking distance. Using Fairfax County tax maps, I calculate just under 440,000 square feet of retail space in that area.
Within a quarter-mile walking distance of the intersection of Maple and Glyndon, there is more total retail space and there are more total establishments than within the Mosaic district.
Continue reading Post #313: Maple versus Mosaic, retail density is not the issue