Post #1283: Final COVID-19 update for the week

 

The U.S. is now 42% below the 9/1/2021 peak of the Delta wave, down 11% in the past seven days. We now stand at an average of 30 cases per 100,000 population per day.

Data source for this and other graphs of new case counts:  Calculated from The New York Times. (2021). Coronavirus (Covid-19) Data in the United States. Retrieved 10/9/2021, from https://github.com/nytimes/covid-19-data.”  The NY Times U.S. tracking page may be found at https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/coronavirus-us-cases.html.

We’re still waiting for the winter wave to start.  If history is going to repeat itself, then the highlighted lines above should begin to turn sharply upward next week.  That’s my diagnostic for whether or not we’ll have a winter wave.


The most mis-represented number in the game right now.

That’s the fraction of infections that are breakthrough infections.  “Breakthrough” being the term-of-art for infections among individuals who are vaccinated.

Let me start with a little clarity.  Virginia updated its COVID-19 numbers “by vaccination status”, to the week ending 10/2/2021.  They look like this:

Source:  Calculated from Virginia Department of Health COVID-19 dashboard data.

Now, before we go a step further, let’s note the obvious.  Note the GREAT BIG SECTION OF THE PIE that is attributable to those who are NOT VACCINATED.

Obvious, right?  Last week, in Virginia, 82% of infections were among un-vaccinated individuals.

A less dramatic but more informative way to present the data is to show both the fraction of the population, and the fraction of infections.  This way, the intelligent reader can correctly infer that INFECTIONS ARE GROSSLY AND DISPROPORTIONATELY CONCENTRATED AMONG THE UN-VACCINATED.

Source:  Calculated from Virginia Department of Health COVID-19 dashboard data.

Again, not exactly rocket science to deliver a clear and unambiguous message.

The problem is, this is straight-up dog-bites-man messaging.  Vaccines are supposed to prevent infection, and they do.  Ho hum.  That’s hardly news.

And, to be clear, this is more-or-less the way the state-level numbers look everywhere.  And that’s because, once again, the COVID-19 vaccines work fairly well, regardless of location.

So not only is it boring, it’s the same everywhere you look.

In the modern world, that’s insufficient click-bait.  That doesn’t bring the eyeballs that fuel the advertising revenues that make the news industry run.

And so, inevitably, headlines for half the articles about breakthrough infections have to make it seem as if vaccines don’t work.  The stories themselves always seem to present the facts.  But the headlines come out of a different universe entirely.

I don’t know if the editors who create those headlines really are sympathetic to the nut-o-verse of anti-vaccine forces, and want to give them some (non-factual) basis to sustain their beliefs.  Or, maybe they’re just scrambling for advertising dollars, and figure the contrarian headlines suggesting that vaccines don’t work will help that.  Or maybe it just tickles their fancy to fashion a headline that’s so clearly contrary to the content of the story.

There is a serious public health issue here, beyond the rate of vaccination.  Immunity fades over time, and booster shots will become increasingly necessary if you want to maintain an optimal level of protection.

But, as is clear from the simple graphs above, that’s a far cry from saying that the current COVID-19 vaccines don’t work.  In my opinion, every state health department ought to be producing their own version of the first graph above.

In a world where we all get our information from the internet, sometimes you really need to slap people in the face with the simple, obvious, and correct story.  Because you can be sure that, intentionally or otherwise, somebody else is out there doing their best to muddy up the waters.

Post #1281: COVID-19 trend to 10/7/2021.

 

Source for featured image:  groundhog.org.

The U.S. stands at 30.6 new COVID-19 cases per 100,000 population per day.

That’s down 40% since the 9/1/2021 peak of the Delta wave, and down 11% over the past seven days.

That’s about the extent of what you’ll see in mainstream coverage of this.

And while that’s true, it’s not the entire story.  Three regions are still at the peak of their respective Delta waves.  Those are the ones to watch now. Continue reading Post #1281: COVID-19 trend to 10/7/2021.

Post #1280: COVID-19 trend to 10/6/2021, Virginia K-12 school opening analysis, no change.

 

Currently, the U.S. as a whole is seeing 31 new COVID-19 cases / 100K / day.

Daily new COVID-19 cases for the The U.S. are now 40% lower than at the 9/1/2021 peak of the Delta wave.

That 40% decline since 9/1/2021 is made up of:

  • Three regions (South Atlantic, South Central, Pacific) where daily new cases are down by about half.
  • Three regions (Northeast, Midwest, Mountain) where daily new cases are roughly unchanged.

Continue reading Post #1280: COVID-19 trend to 10/6/2021, Virginia K-12 school opening analysis, no change.

Post #1279: COVID-19 trend to 10/5/2021: No change

 

The U.S. new case rates continue to fall.  Alaska appears to be well and truly over its hospital capacity crisis.

As of today, U.S. new COVID-19 cases / 100K / day stands at 31.5, down 39 percent  from the 9/1/2021 Delta peak, and down 12% over the past seven days.

Data source for this and other graphs of new case counts:  Calculated from The New York Times. (2021). Coronavirus (Covid-19) Data in the United States. Retrieved 10/6/2021, from https://github.com/nytimes/covid-19-data.”  The NY Times U.S. tracking page may be found at https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/coronavirus-us-cases.html.

Continue reading Post #1279: COVID-19 trend to 10/5/2021: No change

Post #1277: The U.S. as I see it today. It’s all about indoor relative humidity.

This is the New York Times map of current new COVID-19 case rates by county.  With my annotation as to how I interpret it.

Source:   Map is from the New York Times, with my annotations in black.

The first thing that strikes the eye is the sharp difference between western and eastern Oregon and Washington.  There’s a nice straight line between the two.  In part, that’s due to the shapes of the counties there.  But mostly, that’s due to the Rocky Mountains.

The western parts of those states are wet and have relatively mild winters.  The eastern parts are relatively arid and have cold winters.

I’m sure there are other differences as well, but that’s how I perceive that line.  That’s a little test case of wet versus dry climates.

Then, in general, the middle section of the country right now splits between the area with bitterly cold and and relatively arid winters, and the rest of it.   Again, I’m seeing that as the first fingerprints of indoor relative humidity differences.

Finally, on the East Coast, the hotspots of new case growth now are mountain areas.  West Virginia seems to take a lot of blame for low vaccination rate.  But Maine, as I recall, has one of the highest in the nation.  What they have in common is that thinner air and colder temperatures than their adjacent areas.  Higher-elevation areas are showing (what I interpret as) the onset of the winter wave first.

Meanwhile, the entire U.S. humid U.S. south is still recovering from the Delta wave.  Hotspots there are few and far between.

I’ve presented the evidence for the importance of indoor humidity before (Post #894), so there’s no point repeating it.  The only change is that today, I looked at that map and said, there’s no way we’re going to miss a winter wave, if it’s already shaping up like this.

So, while the aggregate U.S. trend remains down, I really don’t think we’re going to skip a winter wave this year.  The rising hotspots are already shaping up along the lines of humidity and partial pressure of water vapor.  At least, that’s how I read it today.

Post #1275: William and Mary, net of two new COVID-19 cases this past week.

Source:  Calculated from William and Mary COVID-19 dashboard.

The only oddity is that the total cumulative positives fell today.  That can happen due to (e.g.) a prior clerical error (such as counting the same student twice, then discovering that.)  Happens all the time in the state-reported COVID-19 counts.  So there might really have been three new cases, plus correction of a long-standing clerical error.  It’s tough to say, but not a lot of difference either way.

It’s not clear that it’s worthwhile to continue to track this.  Students are 98% vaccinated.  New cases are nearly zero.  Guess I’ll watch it for another week or two.

I guess people may now going to start questioning the continuing mask requirements.  And that may not be unreasonable.

But I’m not questioning them.  To understand my position, consider reading my post on how vaccinations work (Post #1200).  It’s a little ham-handed, in response to an outbreak at a big festival in Massachusetts.  But the main message is right.  Everything that cuts down on exposure to COVID-19 viral particles counts toward keeping new cases down.

So, I’m vaccinated and I wear an N95 mask in public spaces.

We can reasonably infer from the current situation that the combined effect of high vaccination rate and good COVID-19 hygiene has all but suppressed COVID-19 in this population.  Both factors contribute.

We cannot infer that vaccination alone will do it.  We don’t have that evidence.  We literally cannot predict how the rate of COVID-19 spread would change if we removed the “COVID-19 hygiene” portion of the current setup.

It’s the same logic behind “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it”.

In my non-W&M posts, I’ve said repeatedly that I think we’re going to have a winter wave of COVID this year.  Best guess, it’ll be at least as bad as last year, based on the tradeoff between the higher infectiousness of the Delta variant, and the higher fraction of the population with some immunity to COVID-19.

As a nation, we’re in the situation depicted below.  The blue line is the first year of the pandemic, the red line is the second year.  Where it stops, that’s where we are right now.

I’m thrilled to see those low numbers on the William and Mary campus.  But I think it’s way too soon to declare victory.