The Chick-fil-a-car-wash is in the process of getting some exterior modifications to reduce light trespass, that is, excessive and annoying spillover of light onto adjacent properties. In this case, the spillover is from the interior lighting of that building onto the nearby townhouses. Councilman Potter championed this change on behalf of the adjacent neighborhood. Approval for those modifications was supposed to occur at the last meeting of the Board of Architectural Review (BAR), but was postponed.
So, good for them, for being willing to make the changes to reduce their light trespass. But you have to ask a) why does a brand new building need this retrofit, and b) is this a one-off problem, or a generic problem that needs to be addressed for future buildings as well?
The answers, as far as I can tell are that a) the Town only checks for light spillover on paper, not in the field, and those paper estimates of light spillover have many shortcomings, and b) yeah, there are already indications that this is an underlying problem that should be addressed more broadly and more proactively.
What I’m saying is, don’t think of this as some sort of one-off mistake. It’s a single example of a generic shortcoming of the zoning process. It should be addressed as such. In much the same way that I argued for changing the code to require closing in garages that face residential areas (to control noise pollution), the Town needs to step up its game and provide real checks on light trespass from new commercial development. Continue reading Post #513: Light trespass and protecting housing adjacent to Maple