Post G24-002: The straight chit on growing potatoes.

 

This post is a classic example of why nobody consults this blog for gardening advice.

If you are a back-yard gardener, and are considering whether or not to grow potatoes, you want advice.   Directions.  You want somebody to say do this, do that.  Follow this approach and success is guaranteed.

Edit 2/5/2025:  Yes, chit your potatoes.  See Post G24-012.  I tried to do a controlled trial of chitting, but chitting gave the potatoes such a big head start that it messed up my experiment.  So chitting — getting the potatotes to break dormancy before planting — definitely gives you a head start on the growing season.  This is particularly important if you live in a warm climate, as I do, where the heat of summer puts an end to my potato season. 

Worth 1000 words:

Original post follows:

But much internet-based advice for the home gardener is folklore.  Frequently repeated, never tested.  Certainly not tested by the folks who repeat it.  Such folklore is sometimes helpful, sometimes merely harmless, and sometimes dead wrong.

What I’m supposed to say in this post is something like “it’s time to chit potatoes now, before you plant them”.  That is, get them to break dormancy and sprout first, then plant the sprouted potatoes.  And then I’m supposed to explain how I go about doing that.

As if I were somehow privy to the innermost secrets of potato-chitting.

What I’m actually going to tell you is this:

  1. The evidence in favor of chitting potatoes is ambiguous.
  2. The recommended procedure for chitting potatoes is all over the map.
  3. Professional potato farms don’t chit their potatoes.

This year, I’m going to set up a little experiment to test the impact that chitting has, for my potatoes, here in Northern Virginia Zone 7.

But in this post, I’ll first explain how I go about growing potatoes in my back-yard garden.  I ignore almost all the rules on proper potato etiquette.  So it’s not clear what my advice is worth, anyway.  But unlike your average garden blogger, I’m up-front about that.

Free advice is worth what you pay for it.


Here’s what I do

Even though potatoes are cheap, I grow them for a lot of reasons, but mostly because it’s easy and effective.

Deer won’t eat them.  Neither, so far, will the bugs.  In a good year, they produce a lot of calories per square foot.  Within reason, you can harvest them whenever you’re ready.  They keep well.  They taste better than grocery-store potatoes.  And around here, they’re done by mid-summer, and you can double-crop with beans or some other short-season crop.  Last year, I planted late-season corn after my potatoes were done.

I start by buying organic potatoes from the grocery store.  Organic, to avoid buying potatoes sprayed with a potent sprouting inhibitor (Post G22-004).   From the grocery store, because I’m cheap, and it’s convenient, and so far, it works just fine.

There are some downsides to this.  You have no clue what your varieties are.  This year, mine are “red” and “gold”, per the picture above.  If you live in the South, don’t bother with russets, as they take too long to mature for this climate (Post #G23-035).  Other than knowing to avoid those, you have no idea if your grocery-store potatoes are early-season, mid-season, or main-season potatoes.  (In the South, you would like to avoid long-season (main-season) potatoes, because potatoes don’t like Southern summer heat.)  If you get a particularly good or bad crop, you can’t replicate the variety.  And so on.  Not to mention, no guarantee they are virus-free. 

OTOH, given that I can typically get potatoes at the grocery store for around 80 cents a pound, as the price of seed potatoes, with shipping, approaches $10/pound, if you do this “right”, you have to have a pretty good yield, just to get your money back.  It’s just a lot less stress to pick up a bag or two at the grocery store, than to obsess over which variety of ludicrously expensive seed potatoes to order.

 I chit them near a window, at room temperature, starting on or about Groundhog Day.   Just set them out, on a tray, and watch for sprouts to start. It’s less than totally decorative, but it’s close to no effort.  This in USDA Zone 7, so adjust accordingly for your climate.  This is roughly 10 weeks before the expected spring last frost date in this area.

See last section for discussion of chitting.

I plant on St. Patrick’s day, after cutting them into chunks the day before.  St. Patrick’s, because I can remember the date.  And because that’s about four weeks before our expected last frost date in the spring.  Planted in the cold of March 17, it takes about a month for the shoots to emerge from the ground, so that, ideally, you’ll see those potato shoots just after danger of frost has passed.

Dig a little trench 4″ or so deep, chuck in the potatoes, cover them up, toss a little mulch on top.  I aim for about a 1′ to 1.5′ spacing in all directions.  Conventional wisdom says that if you plant them further apart, you’ll get fewer, larger potatoes.  Makes sense, but I can’t say that I’ve tested that.  You’re also supposed to “hill” them after they have grown a bit — just mound up a little more dirt onto the potato stems.  Apparently the entire point of hilling is merely to keep the sun off the potatotes, so they do not form poisonous solanine (see Post G23-065, on why green potatoes can kill you, but green tomatoes won’t).  Anything sufficiently opaque — dirt or mulch — will do.

That long time lag between planting and sprouting is a good reason to chit.  If, somehow, your seed potatoes aren’t going to sprout, if you don’t chit, you’ll only find out about it a month or so after you planted them.  Eventually — call it six weeks later — it will dawn on you that you aren’t seeing any potato sprouts, and you need to re-plant.  Which, in the South, means you’ll end up trying to finish off your potatoes in the heat of summer, which is a bad idea.

I plant them in dirt.  I’ve tried no-dig potatoes using straw (worked great, but straw bales are too expensive in my area, Post #1073), and no-dig potatoes using leaf mulch (dismal failure, but hey, the leaf mulch is free in my area, Post G23-041).   Separately, for a variety of reasons, I’m not going to grow potatoes in containers.  So dirt it is.

Why mess around with no-dig potatoes?  Clay soil.  Potatoes don’t like the heavy clay soils in my area, so it takes a huge amount of soil amendments (or bringing in topsoil, which I did for my raised beds) to get dirt that potatoes will grow well in.  If you have clay soil, and want to try potatoes, do-dig is a lot less effort.  In addition, you can use a year of no-dig to convert some lawn to garden bed, if you bury it deeply enough in mulch.  Either way, in the right circumstances, no-dig is a way to reduce the total effort involved.  (Also, the potatoes come out nice and clean.) 

Why did no-dig potatoes in leaf mulch fail miserably, but no-dig potatoes in clean straw were a success?  In hindsight, I think that it allowed the potato tubers to get too hot.  I have since seen one excellent gardener (Self-Sufficient Me, on YouTube have a near-identical potato failure using no-dig in leaf mulch.  Upon reflection, I think that the dark, compacted leaf mulch, in full sun, allows the potato tubers to get too hot, leading to few potatoes set, small potatoes, and knobby potatoes.  Potatoes really do not like heat.  If I do no-digs again, I’ll keep the soil temperature in mind, and either use deep, light-colored mulch, or set up a shade cloth over them.

Separately, regarding fertilizing potatoes, I dump enough leaves on the garden each year that I don’t have to worry about adequate soil nutrients such as nitrogen.  But potatoes, in particular, are supposed to benefit from adequate potassium in the soil.  It’s good for their skins.  (And, correspondingly, potatoes in the skin are a high-potassium food.)  It’s easy enough to test your soil for potassium with one of those $10 soil test kits from the hardware store, and if lacking, to spread minute amounts of potassium chemical fertilizers before you plant a potato bed.

Weed and water them, just like any other plant in the garden.

I pull off the flowers as they form.  This, because the internet tells me to do so.  This process aligns the potato plant’s chakras or something.  I have no clue whether it makes any difference or not.  Just FYI, potatoes have pretty white flowers.

I harvest them when the tops die back.  Or I want the garden space for something else.  Once they start laying lying down and looking straggly, that’s a good sign that they are done for the year, and can be dug up at my convenience.

Note, however, that potatoes do not like heat.  In a warm-summer climate like Virginia, those tops are going to die back sometime around mid-July, no matter whether the tubers underground are finished or not.  If I could pick my varieties, I’d grow early-season (short-season) potatoes.  But given that I grow mine from grocery-store potatoes, … whatever happens, happens.

If I’m lucky, I’ll come in at the low end of the yields posted above.  Not sure if it’s the climate, the soil, the gardener, or the lack of care.  Just be aware that a lot of the miracle yield claims you’ll see on the internet are complete, total, and intentionally misleading bullshit.  When in doubt, check with your local extension service to see what you can reasonably expect in your area.


Addendum:  This year, a small controlled trial of chitting.

Why chit?  Conventional wisdom says this will lengthen your growing season by perhaps a week or two (reference, University of Utah).  I.e., put you a week or two head of the game, compared to planting without chitting.  In the South, that’s a good thing, as potatoes don’t like heat, and they are going to die off in the heat of mid-summer, ready or not.  Plausibly, you’ll get an extra week of growth before the heat kills off your potatoes, and that should translate into higher yield.

But, as with so much advice for the home gardener, everybody repeats this, and seemingly nobody tests it.  There’s surprisingly little hard evidence on the benefits of chitting potatoes, and what evidence there is is mixed (per the Guardian newspaper).

If you search the internet, you’ll see disagreement on almost every aspect of chitting.  The only thing I’m sure of is that it’s optional, because commercial growers don’t chit them.  But seemingly experienced gardeners disagree on:

  • Whether chitting makes any difference in yield, and if so, how much.
  • Whether it makes more difference to early-season (short-time-to-harvest) or main-season (long-time-to-harvest) potatoes.
  • Whether the potatoes should be kept cold or allowed to warm when being chitted.
  • Whether chitting should be done in the light, or in the dark.
  • Whether bags of commercial seed potatoes will “chit themselves”, that is, grow long fragile sprouts regardless (so that bringing them into the light, to produce short green sprouts, is preferred).

As a one-time professional user of vague, observational data, to me, this signals that the benefits of chitting, if any, are probably modest.  If chitting had some huge benefit, people would have noticed.

In fact, I’d say there’s a case to be made that “chitting” was invented as a way to control the inevitable sprouting of potatoes in some climates, absent climate-controlled spaces.  You’d bring your potatoes out of the root cellar, into the light, to green up the sprouts and control the rate of sprouting, so that they’d still be viable when planting time finally came around.

So this year, I’m going do to a little experiment. I’m taking half of each bag of potatoes, pictured above, and chitting them.  And leaving the other half in the fridge for the next six weeks.  This, now done, via the classic one-potato, two-potato randomization.

I then weighed the two randomly-assigned samples, and used a coin flip to determine which was to be chitted, and which was to be stored cold for the next six weeks.

I’ll be planting the chitted and un-chitted spuds, in more-or-less similar plots, on St. Patrick’s day this year.  I’ll track their progress and, absent catastrophe, will weigh the final yield sometime mid-summer.

I realize there’s a lot of potential for random variation in this, despite my best effort to draw from the same batch of potatoes, randomize, and then plant as nearly identically as possible.  I nevertheless think this can be informative.  If, at the end of the season, I can barely tell the difference between the chitted and unchitted spuds, then I think that’s a pretty good clue that chitting has a relatively modest impact on yields.  At least, in my climate, my garden, with my spuds, this year.

So, the null hypothesis is that chitting makes no difference.  I’ll see if I can plausibly reject that.  Expect results sometime around the 4th of July.

 

Post #1940: Dark Groundhog Day.

 

With this latest round of our retaliation, for their retaliation, against our ships, in response to the war, in a completely different country, that resulted from the terrorist action, that arose from pre-existing treatment, that is the residual of long-standing conflict … I’m just having a hard time keeping the basic details straight.

I guess what finally set me off is that I have no clue who the Houthis are, why they hate us, and so on.  And after reading up on it, and honestly trying to grasp what the deal was, all I could think was, it just doesn’t matter.  You could basically do the entire Middle East as a Mad Libs, and it would make just as much sense.  And, apparently, even serious scholars sometimes despair that US Middle East policy is just one big, long Mad Libs (e.g., reference).

The current situation is unexceptional.  It’s just the way the world works.

Source:  Vox, 600 Year of War and Peace, by Zack Beauchamp.  Note that deaths is on a log scale on this chart, which flattens the peaks quite a bit.

Source:  Our World in Data, War and Peace, by Bastian Herre, Lucas Rodés-Guirao, Max Roser, Joe Hasell and Bobbie Macdonald

Source:  Our World in Data.

Post #1939: We’re now past the winter peak of COVID.

 

Just thought you might want to know.  Because nobody ever bothers to tell you when the news is reasonable, normal, and good.

Per CDC, US weekly new hospitalizations with COVID, for the U.S.:

The timing of the wintertime peaks (the black lines above) in COVID is extremely regular.  All four of those winter peaks are January 1, plus or minus a week or so.

This is both surprising and unsurprising.

It’s surprising in that the winter peak of COVID is far more regular than the similar winter peak in flu hospitalizations.  The peak of winter flu hospitalizations varies quite a bit from year to year.

Source:  CDC flu data.

But if you think about it, it’s not all that surprising.  Flu often has quite a different season from year to year, based on a new mix of strains being prevalent each year, and based on spread from epicenters of infection.  COVID, by contrast, is pretty much the same year after year now, and it’s everywhere.

It’s also unsurprising in that these hospitalizations are almost entirely for the elderly, and hospitalization rates for the elderly, for respiratory infections, peak mid-winter every year.  So that’s going to reinforce any tendency for COVID to peak at mid-winter.

That said, Virginia still tracks lab-determined cases, and the Virginia case-count data show the exactly same winter regularity as the U.S. data.  This, from the Virginia Department of Health:

The peaks are again January 1 of each year, plus or minus a week or so.  So it’s not merely a regularity of hospitalizations for the elderly.

Finally, I was tempted to try to make something out of the other apparently regular peaks on that CDC graph, the ones circled below:

But those are a mish-mosh.  The first one is due to a new strain — delta ? – that was then suppressed by vaccines (and replaced by Omicron).  The second one is more-or-less mid-summer, and so predates return-to-school for that year.  The third peak is in early September.  There’s really nothing to link them that I can see.

Post #1938: Psychrophilic bacteria for winter composting, total failure

 

This is a quick followup to post #1921, where I dumped some winter pond maintenance bacteria into one side of my tumbling composter, to see what would happen.  The question was whether or not that would keep my composter working in the cold of winter.

Now, one month later, the short answer is, not.  There is no detectable difference in the level of (un-decomposed) compost, between the treated and un-treated sides.

The upshot is that the only way I’m going to be able to keep that composter working throughout the winter is to heat it.  A little passive-solar-heated shed didn’t do the trick.  These cold-loving bacteria didn’t do the trick.  And having an electrically-heated outdoor composter is a total non-starter, for me.

At this point, I give up.  I just won’t compost kitchen scraps over the winter.

Post #1936: What if this is as good as it gets?

 

Source:  Data are from U.S. DOE, Sources: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-860, Annual Electric Generator Report. U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-861, Annual Electric Power Industry Report. U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-923, Power Plant Operations Report and predecessor forms.

When technology produces big leaps in energy efficiency, it’s pretty easy to make meaningful reductions in your carbon footprint.  Just buy newer stuff.

But as a long-term observer of this issue, it seems to me that technology-driven gains in energy efficiency are hitting their limits.  There are a lot of important areas — cars, fridges, lighting, and even electrical generation itself — where any further reductions in carbon footprint look a lot more difficult.

What I’m trying to say is, looks like technology has already grabbed the low-hanging fruit.

I’m not going to belabor the societal implications of this.  For me, this means that once I’m driving an EV and living in a house with an efficient heat pump and LED lights, there are no more easy reductions in my household carbon emissions.  Nor are there likely to be, for the foreseeable future.  Lifestyle changes, yes.  Effortless reductions in emissions, no.

Maybe this is as good as it gets.

Continue reading Post #1936: What if this is as good as it gets?

Post #1934: No spare tire? When did this happen?

 

You buy into new tech, you expect certain aspects of your life to change.

Buy a Chevy Bolt, and part of the deal is that you stop saying “gas pedal” for the accelerator.  Likewise, “step on the gas” is no longer a valid request.

I guess I should have seen it coming.  But I now wonder how long it will be before the phrase “spare tire” goes the way of “cigarette lighter socket”.


Flat tire?  Use OnStar

The Chevy Bolt provides absolutely nothing for dealing with a flat tire.  It has taken me a while to get my mind around why they did that.  And no, I don’t think it’s just to sell OnStar services.

Era 1:  Ancient history, the true spare tire.

Standard equipment:  Full-service tire and rim, jack, lug wrench.

Back in the day, cars came with five functional rims, and five full-sized tires.  One of those was the spare tire. If you had a flat you could drive on your spare more-or-less indefinitely.  Because your spare was a real tire.

In most cases, you could use any of the five tires/rims, on front or back, or either side of the car.  This, despite whatever folklore you may have absorbed.  This, per the standard method for “rotating the tires”, according to the experts at Bridgestone tires, among others.  (Directional tires — those that have a forward direction of rotation — are the exception.)

Source:  tirerack.com

Era 2:  The limited-service, compact, or doughnut spare

Standard equipment:  Limited-service tire and rim, jack, lug wrench.

Sometime in the 1980s, car makers began to replace the full-sized spare with a “compact spare”.  This was an era when cars were shrinking, gas mileage was at a premium, and competition from foreign manufacturers was intense.  Credit for the first compact spare apparently goes to Volkswagen (reference).

Initially the compact spare was the mark of the econo-box, but eventually it became the norm.

Today, there are still plenty of cars that come with a full-sized spare tire standard, but these tend to run to be cars meant to have an “off road” look, as well as some top-end sedans.  If you buy your typical mid-size middle-of-the-road vehicle, chances are pretty good it comes with a compact spare.

To be honest, as tires got better over the years, and cars got smaller, I found that the full-sized spare was more of a nuisance than a comfort.  Improvements in manufacturing made tire sidewall “blowouts” a thing of the past.  Steel-belted radials made it far harder to get a flat by picking up a nail in the tread.  And, in general, tires just became a whole lot more reliable.  And the full-sized spare ended up just taking up space.

My wife’s 2005 Prius came with a doughnut spare.  We sneered at the time, but a) we used it several times so far, b) it works fine for getting the car to the tire shop, and c) little did we know what was coming up next.

Era 3:  Tire pump, Fix-a-Flat, and a prayer

Standard equipment:  Tire puncture repair kit.

My wife’s 2021 Prius Prime came with no spare at all.  Instead, Toyota provides a “tire puncture repair kit” which, as far as I can tell, consists of some tire sealant in a pressurized can, an electric air pump, and directions for use.

Prayer is optional but recommended.  And as I am a non-religious person, I tossed in an actual tire plugging kit as backup.

This is now the standard on all Prius models.  You don’t even get a doughnut spare,  In effect, you get a can of Fix-a-Flat, an electric tire pump that fits that can, and roughly 35-step directions for use.  I don’t think we even got a lug wrench or a jack, so there’s literally no way for us to take the tire off the car, unless we buy those tools separately. Edit:  Nope, Toyota hid them in an odd spot.  So, oddly, the car does come with jack and lug wrench, but no spare tire of any sort.  That’s a mixed message, for sure.

(For those unfamiliar with the product, Fix-a-Flat (r) is this pressurized goo that you can squirt into a flat tire, and, if all goes well, and you follow directions, it’ll seal the leak in the tire.  At least long enough for you to get to a service station.)

Era 4:  The Chevy Bolt:  Self-sealing tires and real-time tire pressure monitoring.

Standard equipment:  Nada.

The Chevy Bolt takes this to a new low, or new high, depending on your point of view.  Like the Prius Prime, the Chevy Bolt gives you no way to remove a wheel from the car.  No jack, no tire iron. But in addition, they give you no way to fix a flat, period.

Instead, the car comes with “self-sealing tires”.  Bicyclists familiar with the product “Slime” will grasp the concept.  In effect, they have pre-installed Fix-a-Flat, with the idea being that the goo already inside the tires it should seal holes up to about an eighth of an inch.  It also lets you see the tire pressures in real time, which I think would be handy if you’re trying to get a car with a low tire to a service station.

That’s the theory, anyway.  Plus, you are encouraged to subscribe to OnStar.  (I still haven’t figured out how to shut up the OnStar lady upon startup, so I just keep the volume on the radio turned off.)

I have of course put a 12 volt tire pump in the trunk of the Bolt.  Because, in my experience, “self-sealing” tires are more like slower-leaking tires.  It just takes them longer to go flat than if there were no sealant inside the tire.  So I do want to carry some way to inflate the tire.

But I’m thinking long and hard about buying a jack and lug wrench for it.  Not only is the Bolt a relative dense car — short wheelbase, but weighs more than two tons — it has some weird, non-standard jack points.  And Chevy is pretty cagey about just where, exactly, those jack points are, and what will fit.

Crazy as it sounds, to an old guy, Chevy engineers really don’t want the owners to jack up the car, to remove a tire.  And for once, I might just go along with the plan.

In any case, for this car, at least, I think I understand the lack of doughnut spare.  It’s a small, very heavy car.  (As a result, it has a stiff and sometimes uncomfortable suspension, to take all that weight.)  There wouldn’t be a lot of wheel travel with a doughnut spare.  And I think you’d put your battery down too close to the road to be comfortable.

So, on a Prius, if you hit a pothole with the doughnut spare, you might ding a little sheet metal.  With a Bolt, you’ve got some great big battery modules there on the underside of the car.  And I suspect Chevy was a little hesitant to put just a doughnut spare between those and the road surface.


Conclusion

Having had cars with a full-sized spare, a doughnut spare, and no spare, I think the doughnut spare hits the global optimum.  You really only need something that will give you a few miles of travel, a few times in the life of the car.  Just enough to get you home, or to a tire-repair shop.  Dedicating a full-sized tire and rim to that task is wasteful, and overkill.

But no spare?  I’m not too keen on that.  With the Prius Prime, there really is no place to put a doughnut spare.  So I guess I’ll accept Toyota’s puncture repair kit as a necessary evil.  On the Bolt, I can see why Chevy’s engineers might have wanted to avoid a doughnut spare, owing to a very dense, small car with critical components located in the floor of the vehicle.   I’m still not sure why they’ve gone so far out of their way to make it difficult for the Bolt owner to remove a wheel.

In either case — the Prime or the Bolt — I can definitely imagine a situation where I’d want to take the wheel off the car, to get a tire repaired.  That’s a lot less stress on the vehicle than towing the car, just to get a nail puncture repaired.  And right now, that’s not possible, given what the manufacturer supplies with the car.  Not sure what I’m going to do about it.

But this seems to be the trend.  Just as my kids thought I was kidding when I called the 12V power outlet under the dash the “cigarette lighter socket”, someday, when an old guy refers to somebody’s fat gut as a spare tire, none of the younger people are going to have the faintest idea what he’s talking about.

Addendum:  Notes to self on adding donut spares.

Upon further research, nope, no way I can be comfortable driving a care without a spare tire.  Not when I can remedy the situation for a modest expense.

For the 2021 Prius Prime:  The car actually does have a jack, just stowed in an odd place (in a compartment under the back seat).  By report, the tire puncture repair kit is to be used only as a last resort, as using it will kill the tire pressure sensor and require that to be replaced.  By report, the same donut spare fits all regular Prius models from 2004 to 2022.  But the 2017 and later models use a larger, 17″ rim, compared to the earlier models with a 16″ rim.  Experts say you’re better off getting the proper donut for the vehicle.  The Prime still has no place to put a compact spare, and several drivers report tucking it behind a front seat for long trips.  But all we need to do is pick up a donut spare from a junkyard, for any standard Prius model in that range of years,.

For the 2020 Bolt, I’ve already ordered a Chevy S10 jack, from a model year that has the right “button” top jack plate to fit the jack points on the Bolt.  Rumor has it that a Chevy Cruze (2010-2019, excluding diesels!) donut spare will fit the Bolt, with its odd 5/105 bolt pattern.  (The Cruze diesel had slightly larger wheels with a 5/115 bolt pattern).  Everyone says that, owing to the radically smaller diameter of the compact spare (compared to the normal wheel and tire), the compact spare should not be used to replace the front tires (but instead, tires should be shuffled as needed so that a compact spare is used on the rear, in the event of a flat).  The Bolt actually has a wheel well designed to hold a compact spare, but Chevy blocked off part of it, and a spare will only fit completely if stored deflated. 

The upshot is that we’re shopping our local junkyards and/or Ebay for his-‘n’-hers used donut spares, so that when we have a flat, we have some option other than getting towed.

Addendum to Addendum:  I bought some donuts.

Last night I bought what I hope are the relevant donut spare tires off Ebay, having already Ebay’ed a jack/lug wrench for a Chevy S10, to fit the Bolt.  This was more expensive than scrounging the junkyards, but far less expensive than buying a generic boutique “spare nouveu” off Amazon.

The deciding factors in going with the internet were age and fit.  I wanted tires in good shape, because tires degrade over time.  (I didn’t want to buy a donut and immediately have to replace the tire.)  And for the Prius, the rim fit was fairly important.  I only wanted a donut from the latest Prius models, not earlier ones, which means fewer wrecks in the junkyard.

Really, it was like anything else — these days, you get a better selection off the internet than you do in person.  You just pay for it.  When all was said and done, I figured I had a better chance of success picking among 20 or 30 current offerings for each donut on Ebay, than I did driving out to my nearest you-pick junkyard and managing to find exactly what I was after.

On balance, it’s probably a little bit wasteful to carry around that donut spare, when both manufacturers say you don’t need it.  Mostly.  But in the end, I realized the internal inconsistency of stocking a car with disaster preparedness supplies (Post #1628), and then not having any functioning spare.  So I spent a bit of money to fix that.

Case closed.

Post #1933: A short, simple explanation of U.S. immigration law

 

/s.  The title is sarcasm.  This post isn’t about explaining U.S. immigration policy.  It’s about giving up trying to understand it, let alone explain it.

U.S. immigration policy is a stew cooked from ancient and modern quotas, agribusiness needs, humanitarian concerns, special exceptions, vestigial ethnic, racial, and religious bias, aftermath-of-war, left-over anti-communism, workforce shortages, national security issues …you name it.

It’s a dish where everybody gets to toss in an ingredient.  Or maybe everybody who can pay to play gets to.  It’s hard to tell.

Policy consists of turning a blind eye to the results, until it’s politically expedient to do otherwise.

 

And by “blind eye”, I don’t mean merely pretending that those folks don’t exist.  Although there’s plenty of that.

It’s knowing they are there, and dismissing it with a shrug.  Ever wonder why they don’t just impose stiff fines on the businesses who hire illegal aliens?  I mean, putting all the right-wing nonsense aside, if nobody would hire you, there wouldn’t be much incentive to immigrate here illegally, would there?

Ponder this:  About 44% of paid U.S. crop workers are illegal aliens.

Who says so, and how do they know?  Who says that so many agribusinesses engage in such a gross violation of Federal law?  The Federal government does.  That’s straight out of the U.S. Department of Labor, National Agricultural Workers Survey.  (From their 2019-2020 survey results summary, available as a .pdf at this link.)  And that’s the percent of folks who were willing to be interviewed, and willing to admit that they lacked legal status to work in the U.S.   But that’s after excluding all workers under H-2A temporary agricultural worker visas, from the sampling frame, to begin with.)

So it’s not as if this is some unknown, unquantifiable practice.  It’s an integral part of the U.S. food supply.  It continues because in normal times, nobody is quite crazy enough to try to disrupt that without having something else ready to take its place.

Which, needless to say, we ain’t got.

For the past few decades, the “politically expedient to do otherwise” periods seem to occur just after peaks in immigration.

And since we’re having a peak now, you’d expect another round of doing something about it. Beyond the billion or two we’ve been spending each year,  now, to fix the worst holes in the Mexican border.

And so, I finally arrive at the cause of this particular screed.

By report, a large majority of U.S. Senators are on board with beefing up security at the Mexican border.  Among other things.

But it sure looks like nothing will happen, because the Republican candidate for President sees it as too good a political issue to allow it to be solved on somebody else’s watch (reference)And as an added bonus, we can make Putin happy by hanging Ukraine out to dry.  As part of our non-action on this issue.  And the Governor of Texas can defy the U.S. Supreme Court, with impunity.  Ah, that’s an overstatement, but it’s close enough.  Narrowlly construed, I think the Court ruling merely means that the Border Patrol can continue to remove the razor wire that gets in the way of them doing their jobs,  even as the Texas National Guard continues to lay more razor wire.  Not because it makes sense, or is effective.  But because that’s unbeatable political theater.

This is U.S. immigration policy?  Yep, it’s what passes for it, in the current situation.

Define U.S. immigration policy?  Apparently, it’s whatever the Republican executives want it to be.  Nothing more and nothing less.

Maybe I see the past through rose-colored glasses.  Maybe it’s because I spent a decade working for a U.S. legislative-branch agency, and ended up with a lot of respect for then- members of Congress.  But I swear that the U.S. Congress didn’t used to be anywhere near this screwed up.